Priced like one person, not a building.
Agencies typically quote £80–150k for a build I'd deliver for £30–60k. Same output. No PMs, no markup, no committee.
Project work
Fixed quote
agreed up front
Defined-scope work, single quote, single price. Sprints (single features, prototypes, MVPs) typically £8–15k. Full product builds — apps, platforms, AI products — typically £25–75k. Anything bigger, we scope it.
- Quote and timeline agreed before anything starts
- No hourly billing, no scope creep
- Unlimited revisions until you're happy
- Full source, infrastructure, and asset handover
Advisory
£250/h
billed monthly
Architecture reviews, second opinions, scoping calls, debugging, technical due diligence. For ad-hoc help where a fixed quote doesn't make sense.
- Pay only for the time you use
- No minimum commitment
- Best for short investigations and senior input
How I work
- Direct line on Slack, Discord, or WhatsApp — whichever you already use
- Client portal with real-time progress — no status meetings required
- Full access to Figma files, the Git repo, and a live demo environment from day one
- Full-stack delivery: design, frontend, backend, infra, deploy
- No project managers, no subcontractors — every line of work is mine
- You own the code, the infrastructure, the lot
- Honest invoices, no surprise charges
Real projects change. Scope wobbles, priorities shift, and the brief from week one rarely looks like the brief from week six — that's normal. The way I work is built for it: requirements can move without restarting the clock or triggering a fresh round of renegotiation.
Which one fits?
If you've got a defined idea — a product, an app, a platform — a fixed quote means you know the cost before anything starts. If you need a second pair of eyes on architecture, a tricky bug, or just want to think out loud with someone senior, the hourly rate is simpler. Not sure which? Drop me a line and we'll figure it out.